Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Legality of barbed wire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03 December 2007, 06:13 PM
  #31  
[Davey]
Scooby Regular
 
[Davey]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 3,327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thought as much
Old 03 December 2007, 06:38 PM
  #32  
Simon 69
Scooby Regular
 
Simon 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GC8 Enthusiast - Scumball3000 Team 69
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its agrey area, in as much as: you arent forbidden, but trespassers and wrong-doers may sue if they injure themselves on it, because you have a duty of care towards visitors, including the thieving scumbags that youre looking to disuade.

Originally Posted by Daily Telegraph Article
Q. I look after a community hall in a dense residential area. Due to the nature of the building, children have access to the roof and are always climbing on it and causing damage to themselves and the building.To keep the children out and protect the building, I have built a fence complete with razor wire; it is about 10ft high (3m). I was wondering where the law stands with razor wire. I have received conflicting advice and would appreciate your help. JB, by e-mail

A. The law is not clear on this, and it can be difficult to get definitive advice. Most of my inquiries led me to the Home Office, but a spokesman told me he was unable to help. The Association of Chief Police Officers advises against the use of barbed wire, razor wire, wall spikes or broken glass on the grounds that building owners have a duty of care to ensure that visitors to the property are reasonably safe.
This may sound crazy, but that duty extends to trespassers and intruders, and anyone who injures himself on your property may be able to take out a civil action against you.
On a more reasonable note, a serving police officer has pointed out to me that the police in pursuit of a suspect could themselves be injured on the wire, and might therefore consider suing.
However, manufacturers of these products tell me there is no specific legislation that forbids their use, as long as the wire is installed with reasonable precautions. This means that a material such as razor wire should be clearly visible, and not positioned in such a way that it could act as a man-trap. It should therefore either be up high, on top of a fence, wall, or roof, or else protected by an outer fence.
In other words, it should not be possible for an unsuspecting, innocent party to come into contact with it accidentally. It should also be clearly signed with yellow warning triangles that say "Razor barb - Danger" or "Warning - Barbed wire". Proof of adequate signage should provide a good defence in the event of a civil action from an injured trespasser.
Signs should be provided by the manufacturer, or can be obtained from BBT Ltd (01299 251 770 www.birminghambarbedtape.co.uk), which also makes alternative, "less aggressive" intruder deterrents such as Tangle Wire.
Finally, note that any security measure of this nature might be subject to planning or building control regulations, and to be on the safe side you should consult your local authority, as different local authorities have been known to interpret the regulations in different ways. It is generally permissible to build a boundary wall or fence up to two metres high unless it is within one metre of a highway, in which case the limit is one metre high
Simon

Last edited by Simon 69; 03 December 2007 at 06:41 PM.
Old 03 December 2007, 07:43 PM
  #33  
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Simon 69
Its agrey area, in as much as: you arent forbidden, but trespassers and wrong-doers may sue if they injure themselves on it, because you have a duty of care towards visitors, including the thieving scumbags that youre looking to disuade.



Simon
Interesting case, children under say 9 years old playing on a building roof would not be able to sue for damages if injured as the courts see them as being too young to be left unsupervised, and the responsibility remains with the parents.

10 or over and its a different kettle of fish, the new fence may not be enough in its own right. If its 'known' that the children are (or were) playing on the roof then the courts would expect regular security patrols to ensure the children are not breaking into the site.

Its a funny old world!
Old 04 December 2007, 10:51 AM
  #34  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Deep - I just googled, and climbing roses is another "natural" idea. (prettier than the others, too!)
Old 04 December 2007, 11:10 AM
  #35  
Tobisausage
Scooby Regular
 
Tobisausage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Deep - I just googled, and climbing roses is another "natural" idea. (prettier than the others, too!)
I have this in my garden and I have caused myself some serious injuries trying to cut the stuff back. The thorns are like fish hooks and I have gashed my arms up badly. Your reflex action causes you to pull your arm away hard and fast as one of the thorns breaks the skin, lovely.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
T.K
General Technical
10
02 October 2015 11:35 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
01 October 2015 04:30 PM



Quick Reply: Legality of barbed wire?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 AM.