You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
I'd have thought you'd have learnt after crying like a girl last week when SSU was giving you a thrashing and you got all over emotional spouting on several threads telling everyone how you'd been threatened via PM by someone, looking for sympathy.
Then when asked to reveal the PM you said 'Oh it was years ago'
What a grade A wet you are with the keyboard muscles of a super hero.
I was sorry to see him lose. He could have won I believe but overall Roddick produced the better performance.
His serve was not constant enough although he did pull out a few real crackers. He earned the chances to win but whenever that came up he went on the defensive with his sliced returns etc. and you can't rely on a player of Roddick's stature to produce many unforced errors.
I think if he had kept up his attack it may well have been a different story.
Murray has beaten Nadal and Fed this year, more than once i think too.
So what? Are you sying that makes Murray a better player? On those days he was, but overall I think you know who is better!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nat21
Todays win for Rod was purely tactics. They were evenly matched. The score shows and reflects this, anyone who understands tennis can see this.
As for beating him when it mattered, what are you saying, that no other matches matter other than wimbledon?
Indeed not, and Murray's ranking would suggest that he is a better player. No matter what you say, on the day, he was outclassed. He could beat Roddick a million times after this, but yesterday, he simply wasn't good enough.
I really don't see why that is so hard to understand. If you lose, you have been beaten, and that's because the other person was better (albeit on the day).
With hawkeye, there are no unlucky losers anymore.
