The 'SCOTTISH' guy lost :(
The 'SCOTTISH' guy lost :(
Trending Topics
03 July 2009, 06:54 PM
#8
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He was just outclassed today. Still, if he had played like that against Federer, he would have lost 6-0 6-0 6-0, so perhaps it's best.
I don't think Roddick will beat Federer, so another record for the Swiss ponce.
Geezer
I don't think Roddick will beat Federer, so another record for the Swiss ponce.
Geezer
03 July 2009, 07:11 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
if he is a ponce then I would like my 9 year old tennis fanatic son to be a ponce too
i dont think people realise just how good Federer is
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 03 July 2009 at 07:13 PM.
03 July 2009, 07:16 PM
#12
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think Roger Federer is the consumate sportsman -- in the top 3 of all time tennis players, however you cut the statistics and true winner and one of the humblest people you would ever meet, always gives loads of media interviews in 4/5 languages, and time for his fans
if he is a ponce then I would like my 9 year old tennis fanatic son to be a ponce too
i dont think people realise just how good Federer is
if he is a ponce then I would like my 9 year old tennis fanatic son to be a ponce too
i dont think people realise just how good Federer is
I rest my case m'lud
Geezer
03 July 2009, 07:21 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Murrays record against Fed is 6-2 matches btw and John Mac reckons Murray would have beaten him.
He just came up against a superior game plan today. He's beaten Rod before easily but Rods new coach gave Rod the better plan today.
03 July 2009, 07:37 PM
#14
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for JM, well, sorry, I didn't realise he could tell the future, he's never beern wrong has he?.........
Why do people find it so hard to accept that 'their man/team' just wasn't good enough? It's like footballers going "we wuz robbed, we deserved", but the results show patently that they did not!
I wish Murray all the best, I'd love to see him win one, but realistically, unless he raises his game by a large margin, he ain't gonna do it whilst Messrs. Nadal and Federer are on the scene. If Nadal hadn't withdrawn, he potentially would have had to beat both of them with his seeding to lift the title!
Geezer
03 July 2009, 07:41 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
03 July 2009, 07:43 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Murray has beaten Nadal and Fed this year, more than once i think too.
Todays win for Rod was purely tactics. They were evenly matched. The score shows and reflects this, anyone who understands tennis can see this.
As for beating him when it mattered, what are you saying, that no other matches matter other than wimbledon?
Todays win for Rod was purely tactics. They were evenly matched. The score shows and reflects this, anyone who understands tennis can see this.
As for beating him when it mattered, what are you saying, that no other matches matter other than wimbledon?
03 July 2009, 07:45 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Nadal -- is a tough one (although i thought he handled his win last year very well and have alot of time for him)
strongly suspected of using growth hormones, hence his body is fvcked -- and he will never get anywhere near feds achievements, will prob have to give up in another five years due to injuries
he is a power player and maybe he has had an artificial boost in that dept
strongly suspected of using growth hormones, hence his body is fvcked -- and he will never get anywhere near feds achievements, will prob have to give up in another five years due to injuries
he is a power player and maybe he has had an artificial boost in that dept
03 July 2009, 07:55 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
'Fraid you're all wrong about Murray. It was the curse of Jonah Brown that 'dun im' ... Brown Curse Knocks Murray Out - Guy Fawkes' blog
Dave
Dave
well , hard lines 
:l ol: he weren't English
03 July 2009, 08:53 PM
#21
03 July 2009, 09:41 PM
#25
Anyone care to back up their statements about Nadal's use of drugs with any evidence??
Roddick produced a great game on the day that was to good for Murray...I think he will have to reach another level to beat Fedorer though
Roddick produced a great game on the day that was to good for Murray...I think he will have to reach another level to beat Fedorer though
03 July 2009, 09:58 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: York
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Remember that Murray is one of the few players to consistently beat Federer, 6 from 8 and one of the very, very few people Federer worries about playing.
Roddick was very, very clever today - he played exactly the opposite of the way he last played when Murray thrashed him. Clever coach.
Murray needs to expand his tactical game. He was close today, but did not close the deal.
For two or three games he played as well as the very best in the world. He is already massively the most successful Brit in the modern game.
Roddick was very, very clever today - he played exactly the opposite of the way he last played when Murray thrashed him. Clever coach.
Murray needs to expand his tactical game. He was close today, but did not close the deal.
For two or three games he played as well as the very best in the world. He is already massively the most successful Brit in the modern game.
