View Single Post
Old 06 May 2011, 08:08 AM
  #10  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EddScott
for those that had it included but were not even elligible to claim.
to me the above is just the same as the "not fit for purpose" concept that applies to most consumer transactions


I am all for personal responsibility -- but it is just a game, the banks do it to each other so to me seems fair game


and my concept of personal responsibility extends to getting anything back from a bank that was sold to me fraudulently myself, and not using those ridiculous claims companies

nothing has btw I never take any “insurance” policy out

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 06 May 2011 at 11:12 AM.