Old 30 September 2008, 12:56 PM
  #24  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
I'm with Mark on this one... why design a turbo that is bad on purpose?

Get a great responsive turbo and you control boost targets in the mapping to limit the torque in certain areas, but this is ultra responsive when called on the rest of the time.

and

Butty - you will not lose anything over the VF43. As good as that turbo is for an OE turbo, I overlaid some graphs of my old VF43 and the now much bigger MD321V and it whoops it in all aspects. At no point in the power graph does it let you down or deliver less than the std turbo but when it wants to and you allow it - it nails you back in the seat giggling.

Oh and btw you dont need to split the block to put pistons in
define bad for purpose.

you spec up a 650bhp build then your not gonna chuck a td04 on it, the sppol rates good the final pwers crap. so put a turbo on that will run 650bhp and the spool is gonna be measure in coffee breaks compared to the td04.

think thats the issue, the spec they were given didn't allow them to have free reign and get the best and thats y its a sore point.