Originally Posted by
foz200315
Well what a ***** you will feel when you can spend £250 more and avoid £250 of glasses that need charging!!......
my brother has 3d, and i watched some of the Ryder cup on it, for around 2hrs. Was very good i have to say, but left his house with a raging head ache from the stupid fukin glasses, through which i could see the day light from the window flickering when the shutters on the glasses opened and shut (very high speed)....hence the head ache.
Wait for "In screen" 3d, which is nothing more complex than putting the "active shutter" full size over the front of the screen, something they COULD do when they released 3d. But its much easier for TV makers to have you wear sh1tty glasses than add wieght to a TV set........and more pleasing to the public to pay a grand for a TV and buy glasses on top....still makes you feel its "cheap"......