Trader AnnouncementsAnnouncements (including special offers, product/service information) made by Authorised Advertisers
Welcome to ScoobyNet.com!
Welcome to the ScoobyNet.com Subaru forum.
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
scoobyclinics turbo's just got billet I mean better!
The ultimate bolt-on turbo just got better! Introducing our new XT-R
turbo range, now with billet compressor wheels!
Scoobyclinic have been working together with Blouch Performance Turbo
over the past few months to improve on our already class leading
turbos and are proud to announce our new, fully machined, billet,
state-of-the-art, aerodynamic compressor wheels that out perform our
existing trend setting turbos. These compressor wheels are stronger
and 33% lighter than before and all test results indicate that these
high efficiency wheels make more horsepower at less boost pressure
than our current turbos. This translates into quicker spool while
producing greater horsepower and torque - what more could you ask for!
You will not find this cutting edge technology anywhere else.
And if that wasn't enough, we have also developed an improved one
piece exhaust housing that can be applied across the board to our existing
turbo product line to reduce turbine inlet pressure (negative pressure
differential) and increase peak horsepower.
Initial results comparing the current SC50 to the new billet
version have shown an increase of +35bhp and +45ft/lb with similar
spool, even with a bigger turbine housing!! We are hoping to get some
of our own dyno results up in the next few days from our Gaffer's
22B and our 2009 ScoobySprint winning race car. We will let our 2010
results with these turbos speak for themselves, like this year's did
and the year before that!
For a limited time only, the new range of billit turbos will be
available for just £100 above our current turbo prices!
Billit direct fit turbos available:
SC46 XTR Billet.........£1400.00 new lower price = £1295!
SC50 XTR Billet.........£1450.00 New lower price = £1350!
SC54 XTR Billet.........£1495.00 New lower price = £1425!
The XT-R billet wheels are also available for our rotated turbos:
SC46 XTR Billet.........£1400.00 new lower price = £1295!
SC50 XTR Billet.........£1450.00 New lower price = £1350!
SC54 XTR Billet.........£1495.00 New lower price = £1425!
all prices + vat
Trade enquires welcome.
cheers
Ads
__________________
Time Attack Club Pro Champions 2010
Scoobysprint champions 09
LMA Eurosaloon champions 09
Nippon Race series Champions 09
Scoobyshoot drag final winners 09
Last edited by specialx; 27 February 2010 at 09:37.
Reason: new pricing info
today we press on fitting the new SC54 billet turbo, as you can see from the following pictures it genuinely is a direct fit, compressor outlet faces the right way, its on a standard up and down pipe and there is no need to remove lumps of block or bell housing to make it fit, in fact you can actually see on one of the photo's where part of the block and bell housing were removed years ago when this car (The Gaffers 22 B) was testing out the MD series of turbo's.
One of the SC turbo design briefs was to avoid block or bell housing chopping to facilitate fitment.
Printouts to follow
__________________
Time Attack Club Pro Champions 2010
Scoobysprint champions 09
LMA Eurosaloon champions 09
Nippon Race series Champions 09
Scoobyshoot drag final winners 09
we decided to run our first back to back tests on the new SC billet range, the first victim was our scoobysprint and scoobyshoot winning car, the same car that took us to time attack victory in 2008.
This morning we ran the car showing a healthy 540.8 bhp
We simply swapped out the turbo for our new billet version shown here on the left
We then ran the car again
No adjustments were made this was a straight forward back to back test on the same day with same atmospheric conditions this gave us quicker spool, 46.8 bhp, 30 ftlbs of torque, all on pump gas, we expect to see 600 bhp from this once mapped, and I stress all on pump gas.
Result
cheers
Ads
__________________
Time Attack Club Pro Champions 2010
Scoobysprint champions 09
LMA Eurosaloon champions 09
Nippon Race series Champions 09
Scoobyshoot drag final winners 09
Last edited by specialx; 06 November 2009 at 18:00.
Hi,
morrisons finest, and yes 590 bhp on a 30R with a 0.63 hot side
Compressor wheel is custom made to our specs, its a billet wheel caperble of flowing 55 llbs of air and is 33% lighter than the original Garratt wheel. Boost wise it was running 1.9 bar, as soon as we get the time, possably tomorrow, we will map it to see where it max's out
Hope the above helps
cheers
Ads
__________________
Time Attack Club Pro Champions 2010
Scoobysprint champions 09
LMA Eurosaloon champions 09
Nippon Race series Champions 09
Scoobyshoot drag final winners 09
Last edited by specialx; 06 November 2009 at 18:12.
Reason: forgot to answer boost question
Hi,
morrisons finest, and yes 590 bhp on a 30R with a 0.63 hot side
Compressor wheel is custom made to our specs, its a billet wheel caperble of flowing 55 llbs of air and is 33% lighter than the original Garratt wheel. Boost wise it was running 1.9 bar, as soon as we get the time, possably tomorrow, we will map it to see where it max's out
Hi,
to be fair I think it would be very laggy and not worth doing, we are about to test the SC 46 Billet, which I feel will be a far better candidate for you, as soon as we have results we will post them up.
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Simtek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 1,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gaffer
Hi,
as promised yesterday ( Friday ) we have run our new SC 54 XTR billet turbo, fitted to our 22B.
Result
This is achieved on Shell V power, not race fuel just plain old pump gas
Boost and AFR showing power at the wheels.
All this on a direct fit turbo, a true direct fit turbo, wonder what it will do on a 10% meth mix
Up date coming soon.
cheers
Kev
Very nice figures guys.
Purely out of interest I will pop the dyno correction figures shown on the graph onto our dyno on Monday to see the overall correction factor. It may be interesting to apply the same corrections to all our graphs in future .
Very nice figures guys.
Purely out of interest I will pop the dyno correction figures shown on the graph onto our dyno on Monday to see the overall correction factor. It may be interesting to apply the same corrections to all our graphs in future .
be interesting to see the comparisons on a like for like basis martyn, be even better when you have something different to compare over the next few weeks
Very nice figures guys.
Purely out of interest I will pop the dyno correction figures shown on the graph onto our dyno on Monday to see the overall correction factor. It may be interesting to apply the same corrections to all our graphs in future .
I was annoyed the other week as I ran the same car on the same map at surrey rolling road and at scoobyclinic on different days and there was 0.4bhp difference on a car producing just over 500bhp.. disgraceful lol
Simon
__________________ Jolly Green Monster Limited
Full time mapper and Ecu Expert - EcuTek 99 to 2005, Ecutek including Racerom 2006 to 2011, ESL 93 to 96, Apexi, Motec, Autronic, Link, GEMs, Simtek, Solaris/Syvecs remaps
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Simtek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 1,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
I was annoyed the other week as I ran the same car on the same map at surrey rolling road and at scoobyclinic on different days and there was 0.4bhp difference on a car producing just over 500bhp.. disgraceful lol
Simon
I don't doubt that for a second Simon, but when was the last time you saw a Barometric pressure reading of 978mb in this country ?
when was the last time you saw a Barometric pressure reading of 978mb in this country
Errrr... last time we looked at the weather station, shortly before playing around with the map. Not all of us live at sea level Martyn...
Just as a sanity check I popped the post code into the Met Office weather database. It didn't have data for our exact location, closest was Nottingham Watnall and that read 992hPa at the time of the run. This site is 117m above mean sea level. According to Ordnance Survey the buildings at Scoobyclinic are 205m above mean sea level, some 88 metres higher.
Pressure altitude calculations suggest that an 88 metre difference would result in about 10.5hPa difference in station pressure, which would give a "verified" station pressure of 981.5hPa at Clinic today, compared to the weather station reading of 978, a difference of only 3.5hPa, and that doesn't take into account the fact that the verified reading was a few miles away, ie there could easily have been a 3.5hPa pressure gradient, but I'm happy enough to accept that as an instrumentation error, the basic accuracy of weather stations is not on par with the lab grade stuff the Met Office use.
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Simtek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 1,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by pat
Errrr... last time we looked at the weather station, shortly before playing around with the map. Not all of us live at sea level Martyn...
Just as a sanity check I popped the post code into the Met Office weather database. It didn't have data for our exact location, closest was Nottingham Watnall and that read 992hPa at the time of the run. This site is 117m above mean sea level. According to Ordnance Survey the buildings at Scoobyclinic are 205m above mean sea level, some 88 metres higher.
Pressure altitude calculations suggest that an 88 metre difference would result in about 10.5hPa difference in station pressure, which would give a "verified" station pressure of 981.5hPa at Clinic today, compared to the weather station reading of 978, a difference of only 3.5hPa, and that doesn't take into account the fact that the verified reading was a few miles away, ie there could easily have been a 3.5hPa pressure gradient, but I'm happy enough to accept that as an instrumentation error, the basic accuracy of weather stations is not on par with the lab grade stuff the Met Office use.
Cheers,
Pat.
992 was the reading stated on the met office, if you are MUCH higher above sea level than the reading for the surrounding areas, then I apologise .
Did you happen to note the overall correction factor stated on the dyno for the runs ? Not that it matters of course as anyone with a DD dyno can type in the numbers at the bottom of the graph and see it for themselves.